News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Blockade is costing businesses 

Blockade is costing businesses

14 Dec, 2011 03:00 AM
A war of words has erupted as the blockade, launched by the Barrington Gloucester Stroud Preservation Alliance continues.

Gloucester Shire Council mayor Geoff Slack has said while he is happy for people to protest, he doesn’t condone people breaking the law by blocking a public road.

He said the impact of the blockade on other businesses and people is of concern.

”If companies have to start standing down people, there is a flow on effect through the community,” Cr Slack said.

As a solicitor Cr Slack said he had spent 40 years trying to uphold the law and he said the blockade was not a lawful activity and as such he would not be visiting the site.

The Mayor said council has previously given its in principal support to the AGL gas project and AGL has been granted government approval for the project.

Alliance chairman Graeme Healy the mayor had not visited the blockade and said comments made by the mayor in the Newcastle Herald on Monday about the blockade not representing the views of the community were wrong.

Mr Healy said the blockade was directed against AGL.

“We have tried to ensure minimal inconvenience to local landholders and businesses.”

One local business operator who did not wish to be named said the blockade was having a direct impact on his business and would cost hundreds of thousands in lost revenue.

“We estimate it will cost the town around $200,000 a month. It’s massive, I don’t think people understand the repercussions of what they’ve done.”

“I’m not pro-mining, I’m not anti-mining, I’m a business person.”

“It’s going to put a big stain on our town.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So that we may all better understand the situation would Mayor Slack please say why he thinks local businesses may have to stand people down? I am also very concerned to read a local business person will lose hundreds of thousands of $$. Please enlighten us.
Posted by concerned sen sit, 14/12/2011 5:32:31 AM, on Gloucester Advocate
Effective journalists know that quotes from anonymous sources are worth less thatn the paper they are printed on.

The ringbarking of Gloucester by AGL coal seam gas wells is a serious concern to many residents and as such the community deserves the best journalistic priactices from its usually excvellent local newpaper.

Posted by Shebam, 14/12/2011 7:13:44 AM, on Gloucester Advocate
I don't understand why a person who is so concerned for the community and has gone to the trouble to work out the cost to it prefers to remain anonymous. Surely with an issue so topical for the area it is about time the secret agendas are banished and the vested interests are exposed.
Posted by Graham., 14/12/2011 9:05:57 AM, on Gloucester Advocate
Well done to the blockaders. I live on the Surat Basin and know many local business men, I know only of earth moving businesses and motels that benifit from this industry. The loosers are the average person, the farmer, the butcher, the businesses who are long established suppliers who loose staff. A friend of mine lost his valued worker of 27 years to the industry, he is in his eighties. Chinchilla weir is being filled with treated product water, water USA experts say can't be treated adequately. Gas for China and India wont feed us in the future, cant drink gas, or it's polluted water.
Posted by Brian Monk, 14/12/2011 10:10:35 AM, on Gloucester Advocate
What no blogs at all on this very serious issue.

Why have a comments section if they are not publishjed.

The Newcastle Herald can mange it why not

the Gloucester Advocate?

Posted by Shebam, 14/12/2011 1:48:11 PM, on Gloucester Advocate
How can a blockade cost $200 000 to the community. Mining companies are well known for bulk purchasing equipment and resources outside the community they are destroying.

People who participate in the blockade spend their money locally due to the restriction of wanting to spend as little time away from the blockade, update folk about what is happening and to maintain the community support.

If the Advocate would name the business owner/company blockaders could explore ways that disruption to the local economy is minimised.

After all this is to protect Gloucester long term.

Posted by Cassie McMahon, 14/12/2011 2:01:44 PM, on Gloucester Advocate
quote " One local business operator who did not wish to be named"?? If what he is stating is true they why would he not be named? Probably because it's not true. Regardless what is this CSG industry going to cost the whole community if their whole water system is poisoned as it has been in parts of the U.S.A? What is it going to do to tourism and agriculture, let along quality of life and having safe air to breathe? Add another 2 or 3 zero's to that $200,000 a month and that will be what this area will be losing if it allows CSG into the area. short term gain, long term pain.
Posted by worried mum, 14/12/2011 4:20:46 PM, on Gloucester Advocate
All mining companies use the big stick of saying business in small communities will suffer if they don't let the mines do what they want. It's pure propaganda. Miners are blow ins who don't live in the town or spend their money in the towns. Towns get nothing from mines except lies and propaganda.
Posted by neville nobody, 15/12/2011 10:06:31 AM, on Gloucester Advocate
It's called civil disobedience, where the laws an ass and the law makers created laws to disempower the community so that they could insert Coal and Gas Mining where people once lived. The belief that land owners have no rights and that the government has all the rights to award private land to the highest bidder as an exploration lease is wrong. These laws used to remove the owners, give authority to enter and drill for gas then forece the industry on the community is only overshowed by the rigged system that enabled the Coal Mine to remove the community before the GSG miners got there.
Posted by Lieasandmorelies, 18/12/2011 11:24:21 PM, on Gloucester Advocate

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Gloucester Advocate







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...