Reebok fined for misleading customers about EasyTone sneakers

By Esther Han
Updated October 23 2014 - 7:18pm, first published 3:28pm
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Gloucester news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.